State v. McKinney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding police did not violate privacy rights of drivers by accessing Department of Licensing records, in part because such records are created and maintained for law enforcement purposes
• finding no privacy interest in department of licensing records because they do not “reveal intimate details of the defendants’ lives, their activities, or the identity of their friends or political and business associates”
• “Considering the purpose for which these [DOL] records are created, citizens of this state are not entitled to expect that their information is private and protected from disclosure for law enforcement purposes.”
• \A majority of the justices in Maxfield held there is no protected privacy interest in power records.\
• “It is now well settled that the protections guaranteed by article I, section 7 of the state constitution are qualitatively different from those provided by the Fourth Amendment. . . .”
• citizens are not entitled to expect Department of Licensing (DOL) records are private and protected from disclosure because the records are gathered by a government agency for law enforcement purposes, and several Washington statutes attest to this fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• State v. Jackson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-09-11· cited 218×
• State v. Athan
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-05-10· cited 154×
• American Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTH
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-09-11· cited 129×
• American Legion Post No. 149 v. Department of Health
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-09-11· cited 127×
• State v. Chenoweth
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-05-24· cited 114×
• State v. Domicz
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2006-09-20· cited 104×
• State v. McKinney
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-08-08· cited 89×
• State v. Hinton
  Washington Supreme Court· 2014-02-27· cited 85×
• State v. Hathaway
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-05-03· cited 75×
• York v. Wahkiakum School Dist. No. 200
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-03-13· cited 72×
• TS v. Boy Scouts of America
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-07-27· cited 72×
• State v. Williams-Walker
  Washington Supreme Court· 2010-01-14· cited 71×
• State v. Snapp
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-04-05· cited 70×
• Andersen v. King County
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-07-26· cited 70×
• York v. Wahkiakum School District No. 200
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-03-13· cited 68×
• Madison v. State
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-07-26· cited 67×
• T.S. v. Boy Scouts of America
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-07-27· cited 67×
• State v. Miles
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-04-26· cited 66×
• State v. Eisfeldt
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-06-05· cited 60×
• State v. Jorden
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-04-26· cited 59×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gunwall
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-06-12· cited 1,052×
• State v. Russell
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-10-13· cited 831×
• State v. Ladson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-07-01· cited 415×
• State v. Myrick
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-09-13· cited 276×
• State v. Boland
  Washington Supreme Court· 1990-11-15· cited 249×
• State v. Simpson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-12-31· cited 247×
• State v. Johnson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-01-18· cited 221×
• City of Seattle v. McCready
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-02-24· cited 158×
• Matter of Maxfield
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-10-16· cited 89×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Maxfield
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-10-16· cited 69×
• State v. Harlow
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-04-03· cited 9×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-25· cited 6×