Skip to main content

State v. Jorden

Citations

  • 156 P.3d 893

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding random, suspicionless searches of a motel guest registry unconstitutional because those searches may provide “ ‘intimate details about a person’s activities and associations’ ” (quoting McKinney, 148 Wn.2d at 30 n.2)
  • invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release
  • finding random, suspicionless searches of a motel guest registry unconstitutional because those searches may provide \'intimate details about a person's activities and associations\' (quoting McKinney, 148 Wn.2d at 30 n.2
  • “[T]his court has consistently expressed displeasure with random and suspicionless searches, reasoning that they amount to nothing more than an impermissible fishing expedition.”
  • article I, section 7 prohibits law enforcement from checking names in motel registry for outstanding warrants absent “individualized or particularized suspicion”
  • article I, section 7 prohibits law enforcement from checking names in motel registry for outstanding warrants absent \individualized or particularized suspicion\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.