New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 3/16/2011
State v. McGuire
Citations
- 16 A.3d 411
- 419 N.J. Super. 88
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a prosecutor's statements that would otherwise be improper \may be deemed harmless if made in response to defense arguments\
- affirming exclusion of allegedly incriminating hearsay statement where there was no evidence that the declarant knew the statement might subject him to criminal prosecution
- \A prosecutor's otherwise prejudicial arguments may be deemed harmless if made in response to defense arguments.\
- \A prosecutor's otherwise prejudicial arguments may be deemed harmless if made in response to defense arguments.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Fuentes, Ashrafi and Nugent
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of New Jersey v. Kashif K. PattersonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2014-05-09· cited 37×
- People v. LunaAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-04-25· cited 22×
- McLean v. Liberty Health SystemNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2013-03-28· cited 10×
- State v. AtesNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2012-05-17· cited 8×
- In re: M.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-10-12
- State of New Jersey v. Rolando TerrellNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2017-11-29
- State v. William T. Liepe (080788) (Atlantic County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2019-08-06
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DAVID GHIGLIOTTY (17-02-0154, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2020-04-20
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TIMOTHY J. CANFIELD (16-12-3619, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2022-01-10
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DANIEL ROCHAT (13-07-1002, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2022-01-28
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RAMI A. AMER (18-06-0460, GLOUCESTER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2022-03-31
- State v. C.P.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2025-01-13
- State v. Celestine PayneSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2025-01-13
- State of New Jersey v. Gualberto L. LebronNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2026-02-24
Cites
89 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 3,512×
- State v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-02-07· cited 1,201×
- State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1971-01-25· cited 857×
- State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-03-05· cited 731×
- State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-07-24· cited 515×
- State v. DiFriscoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-07-27· cited 455×
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-01-24· cited 445×
- State v. KoedatichSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1988-08-03· cited 379×
- Estate of Hanges v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-06-21· cited 376×
- State v. FrostSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-04-15· cited 360×
- State v. CastagnaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2006-07-17· cited 338×
- State v. TimmendequasSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-08-11· cited 325×
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2005-06-16· cited 294×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1988-12-08· cited 285×
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-07-30· cited 272×
- State v. R.B.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2005-05-23· cited 271×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-04-26· cited 268×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2001-12-03· cited 265×
- Hisenaj v. KuehnerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2008-03-06· cited 251×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.