Hisenaj v. Kuehner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that trial court's evidentiary decision to admit expert testimony is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
• stating that the trial court's evidentiary decision to admit expert testimony is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
• noting that parties are “free to pursue” on cross- examination specific weaknesses in an expert’s admissible methodology
• noting that courts use an abuse of discretion standard in reviewing evidentiary ruling
• holding an expert's opinion must be founded on \facts or data\
• applying an abuse-of-discretion scope of review to a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of expert opinion in a civil case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).