Skip to main content
· 6/21/2010

Estate of Hanges v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

Citations

  • 997 A.2d 954
  • 202 N.J. 369
  • 2010 N.J. LEXIS 513

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that admissibility of hearsay within hearsay requires that each level of hearsay have “a separate basis for admission into evidence”
  • observing that admissibility of hearsay within hearsay requires that each level of hearsay have \a separate basis for admission into evidence\
  • observing that admissibility of hearsay within hearsay requires that each level of hearsay have \a separate basis for admission into evidence\
  • stating, \the decision to admit or exclude evidence is one firmly entrusted to the trial court's discretion\
  • instructing \a trial court confronted with an evidence determination precedent to ruling on a summary judgment motion squarely must address the evidence decision first\
  • noting a court confronted with an evidentiary question on summary judgment must resolve that question before ruling on summary judgment and appellate review follows in the same sequence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rivera-Soto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.