Supreme Court of New Jersey· 4/15/1999

State v. Frost

Citations

727 A.2d 1
158 N.J. 76
1999 N.J. LEXIS 389

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that prosecutors are granted significant leeway to make forceful arguments in summation “as long as their comments are reasonably related to the scope of the evidence”
holding that \[t]he failure to object suggests that defense counsel did not believe the remarks were prejudicial at the time they were made.\
holding that failure to object to testimony permits an inference that any error in admitting the testimony was not prejudicial
holding that \[t]he failure to object suggests that defense counsel did not believe the remarks were prejudicial at the time they were made\
holding that \[t]he failure to object suggests that defense counsel did not believe the remarks were prejudicial at the time they were made.\
stating that \[t]he failure to object suggests that defense counsel did not believe the remarks were prejudicial at the time they were made\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

79 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Frost

75 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.