Rozas v. Rozas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under Rule 702 of the West Virginia Rules of Evidence, “a trial judge has broad discretion to decide whether expert testimony should be admitted, and where the evidence is unnecessary, cumulative, confusing or misleading the trial judge may properly refuse to admit it”
• “Absent a showing that a natural parent is unfit, a natural parent’s right to custody outstrips that of a grandparent.” (citations omitted)
• “[WJhere the evidence is unnecessary, cumulative, confusing or misleading the trial judge may properly refuse to admit it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).