Skip to main content

State v. Anderson

Citations

  • 655 P.2d 1196
  • 33 Wash. App. 517
  • 1982 Wash. App. LEXIS 3447

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that while dispositional hearings under the sexual psychopathy statute (RCW 71.06.091) are not explicitly exempted, they fall within the rationale of ER 1101(c)
  • concluding that while dispositional hearings under the sexual psychopathy statute (RCW 71.06.091) are not explicitly exempted, they fall within the rationale of ER 1101(c)
  • the standard for reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence for commitment under California's sexually violent predator act is the same as the standard for a criminal conviction
  • trial court's refusal to appoint expert not reversible error where defendant made no offer of proof regarding the necessity of additional expert testimony and the trial court found that additional evaluations and reports by experts would be cumulative
  • evidence rules inapplicable in sexual psychopath, proceeding under RCW 71.06.091

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corbett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.