Skip to main content

State v. Cates

Citations

  • 183 Wash. 2d 531
  • 354 P.3d 832

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a matter is “ripe ‘if the issues raised are primarily legal, do not require further factual development, and the challenged action is final.’”
  • challenge to nearly identical condition requiring consent to home visits not ripe for review
  • an issue is not ripe for review until the challenged action is final

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Faiehuest, Fairhurst, González, Johnson, Madsen, McCloud, Owens, Stephens, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Cates

29 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.