State v. Rinaldo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, in a post-Addington decision, that the “analogy to Winship is clear and persuasive,” and holding that, in absence of statutory direction, “ ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ is the proper standard of proof to be employed in the initial sexual psychopathy commitment proceeding.”
• appeal of designation as sexual psychopath was not moot because the designation affected defendant's parole status and eligibility for early release, and \the stigma associated with the classification is of no small consequence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re the Personal Restraint of Knapp
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-09-06· cited 53×
• United States v. Comstock
  E.D. North Carolina· 2007-09-07· cited 33×
• In Re the Personal Restraint of Kolocotronis
  Washington Supreme Court· 1983-03-10· cited 10×
• State v. Gann
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-01-23· cited 4×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• Specht v. Patterson
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 837×
• People v. Burnick
  California Supreme Court· 1975-05-15· cited 210×
• Hartman v. Washington State Game Commission
  Washington Supreme Court· 1975-02-27· cited 81×
• United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Stachulak v. Joseph Coughlin
  Seventh Circuit· 1975-08-06· cited 70×
• Cornelius E. Sarzen v. Charles W. Gaughan
  First Circuit· 1973-12-10· cited 57×
• Allison v. Patterson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1978-06-08· cited 37×
• David Hollis v. Harold J. Smith, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent
  Second Circuit· 1978-02-17· cited 36×
• State v. McCarter
  Washington Supreme Court· 1978-12-28· cited 29×
• State Ex Rel. Fulton v. Scheetz
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1969-04-08· cited 18×
• In Re Miller
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1953-03-03· cited 14×