New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 3/23/2007
State v. McCann
Citations
- 919 A.2d 136
- 391 N.J. Super. 542
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding disqualification was necessary where the motion judge previously represented defendant for several years, and was thus not a \neutral and detached magistrate.\
- holding suppression was not an appropriate remedy when a municipal court judge who issued a search warrant should have recused himself due to his \long-standing attorney-client 22 A-4399-14T2 relationship\ with the defendant
- mere appearance of bias alone is insufficient, objectively reasonable partiality must be established
- mere appearance of bias alone is insufficient, objectively reasonable partiality must be established
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Kestin, Weissbard and Graves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-11-06· cited 152×
- State v. McCabeSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-01-25· cited 76×
- State v. Broom-SmithNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-04-03· cited 59×
- State of New Jersey v. Calvin PresleyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2014-07-17· cited 16×
- State of New Jersey v. Julian B. HamlettNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2017-03-03· cited 15×
- State of New Jersey v. Edward HollandNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2017-04-05· cited 15×
- State v. J.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-04-07· cited 15×
- State of New Jersey v. Timothy AdkinsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2013-12-20· cited 14×
- State v. GioeNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2008-07-02· cited 7×
- State v. JGSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-04-07
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court· 1955-05-16· cited 2,510×
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-11-08· cited 1,331×
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-03-05· cited 771×
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1921-01-31· cited 748×
- Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1979-06-11· cited 642×
- State v. NovembrinoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-01-07· cited 387×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1992-10-23· cited 278×
- Winberry v. SalisburySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1950-06-27· cited 275×
- Connally v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1977-01-10· cited 175×
- Alexander v. Primerica Holdings, Inc.Third Circuit· 1993-11-29· cited 152×
- State v. BursteinSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-03-16· cited 143×
- State v. KnightSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1996-07-11· cited 138×
- United States v. Harvey NobelThird Circuit· 1983-01-05· cited 94×
- United States v. Basil Vespe, David L. Padrutt and Alex Fein, A/K/A Alex Feinman. Appeal of Basil VespeThird Circuit· 1989-02-28· cited 91×
- Nobel v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-13· cited 78×
- United States v. William Alan TownsendThird Circuit· 1973-04-10· cited 77×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.