Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \[d]eferential review . . . might not cure any prejudice\
• noting that dispositive-motion deadlines are intended to further judicial economy and fairness
• stating that \[d]eferential review ... might not cure any prejudice\
• defining ex parte communications as communications between a judge and a litigant without the opposing party present
• declining to vacate orders en masse where there was, among other things, no “likelihood of ac- tual bias”
• adopting rule that “failure to disqualify (and hence failure to vacate a ruling) may be harmless error when a court of appeals will later review a ruling on a plenary basis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).