Skip to main content

State v. J.G.

Citations

  • 201 N.J. 369
  • 990 A.2d 1122
  • 2010 N.J. LEXIS 381

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that \[t]he 1981 revision [to the priest-penitent privilege] paralleled the A-4975-17T3 25 psychologist-patient privilege in one other way: it protected both communications and the fact that a confidential relationship existed between a cleric and a penitent.\
  • “[C]ourts sensibly accommodate privileges to the ‘aim of a just result[.]’ ” (quoting State v. Briley, 53 N.J. 498, 506, 251 A.2d 442 (1969))
  • “[C]ourts sensibly accommodate privileges to the ‘aim of a just result[.]’” (quoting State v. Briley, 53 N.J. 498, 506 (1969))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabner, Rivera, Soto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.