State v. Schneider

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• con- cluding that prosecutorial misstatements were not harmless where the statements “were harmful to defendant’s main theory of defense” and “had some likelihood of affecting the jury’s verdict”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Muniz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-04-17· cited 13×
• State v. Strain
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-04-17· cited 3×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-07-09· cited 2×
• State v. Schneider
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-10-18

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
• State v. Mayo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-04-15· cited 49×
• State v. Rosasco
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1922-03-21· cited 38×
• State v. Purrier
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-24· cited 37×
• State v. Totland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-03-20· cited 33×
• State v. Skotland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-06-22· cited 9×
• State v. Sanchez-Cacatzun
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-06-17· cited 5×
• State v. Solis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-05-17· cited 5×