Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/23/2025

State v. Putnam

Citations

  • 340 Or. App. 61

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that although there were several improper statements by the prosecu- tor, each brief remark could have been stricken
  • determining that although there were several improper statements by the prosecu- tor, each brief remark could have been stricken
  • reviewing “each chal- lenged statement in context of the closing arguments and the trial record as a whole”
  • reviewing “each chal- lenged statement in context of the closing arguments and the trial record as a whole”
  • “[W]e review statements made by a party 272 State v. Lugo during argument in context, not in a vacuum.” (Internal quo- tation marks omitted.)
  • prosecutor statement about what “sexual offenders of children will do” was improper where there was “no testimony or evidence related to general behaviors or tactics employed by child sex abusers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacquot

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.