Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/17/2024

State v. Brannan

Citations

332 Or. App. 36
549 P.3d 19

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a prosecutor’s argu- ments were not obviously improper where a jury could have understood them as an explanation that the evidence before the jury did not support defendant’s theory of the case
holding that an argument was not improper where it suggested that defendant had “to convince [the jury] with evidence” and thus how the jury should assess defendant’s theory of the case in light of the evidence presented during trial
holding that an argument was not improper where it suggested that defendant had “to convince [the jury] with evidence” and thus how the jury should assess defendant’s theory of the case in light of the evidence presented during trial
explaining that, in Mayo, the prosecutor’s argument was improper because it implied that “the defendant should have presented corroborating evidence—beyond the defendant’s own testimony—to support his theory of the case” (empha- sis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.