Supreme Court of Vermont· 12/6/1996
State v. May
Citations
- 689 A.2d 1075
- 166 Vt. 41
- 1996 Vt. LEXIS 112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a restitution order for lost profits was speculative and did not meet the reasonable certainty standard
- noting that in ascertaining damages, “mathematical certainty is not required, but there must be a reasonable basis for estimating the loss”
- noting that in ascertaining damages, “mathematical certainty is not required, but there must be a reasonable basis for estimating the loss”
- noting that a manager of the business victimized conceded that he had no idea how many potential customers the business had lost as a result of the theft and no idea of the value of the projects that might have been lost
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pierce v. WallSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2008-02-11· cited 15×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-04-17· cited 13×
- State v. MorseSupreme Court of Vermont· 2014-07-25· cited 12×
- In Re Delric H.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-03-27· cited 11×
- State v. GortonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2014-01-17· cited 10×
- State v. FontaineSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-04-17· cited 2×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Border Apparel-East, Inc. v. GuadianTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1994-01-16· cited 45×
- State v. JarvisSupreme Court of Vermont· 1986-03-14· cited 39×
- Lemnah v. American Breeders Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1984-06-29· cited 38×
- State v. PearceCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-02-25· cited 25×
- State v. IhdeCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 1995-03-30· cited 23×
- People v. KnowlesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-12-30· cited 19×
- Retrovest Associates, Inc. v. BryantSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-01-26· cited 16×
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-02-17· cited 12×
- State v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-11-12· cited 10×
- Starnes v. First American National Bank of JacksonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1986-07-14· cited 10×
- In re Estate of BoisvertSupreme Court of Vermont· 1977-02-01· cited 8×
- State v. KisorCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-05-31· cited 7×
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-04-28· cited 6×
- D.L. Development, Inc. v. NanceMissouri Court of Appeals· 1995-03-09· cited 6×
- State v. JuradoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-11-15· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.