State v. Kisor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Rejecting defendant’s argument that his restitution should be reduced by the amount of donations the crime victim received from private individuals.
• restitution damages are easily ascertainable if evidence affords reasonable basis for estimating loss and does not subject trier of fact to mere speculation and conjecture
• officer not a victim despite loss of personal time spent with police dog killed by defendant, although county could recoup costs of training a new dog

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Enstone
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-04-15· cited 104×
• State v. May
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1996-12-06· cited 12×
• State v. Pagenkopf
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-02-12· cited 3×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davison
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-05-16· cited 161×
• Xieng v. Peoples National Bank
  Washington Supreme Court· 1993-01-21· cited 133×
• State v. Mark
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-01-11· cited 63×
• State v. Pollard
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-08-03· cited 54×
• State v. Kisor
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-02-04· cited 53×
• State v. Fleming
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-08-01· cited 50×
• State v. Martinez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-08-02· cited 49×
• State v. Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-07-02· cited 40×
• Ciminski v. SCI CORPORATION
  Washington Supreme Court· 1978-11-02· cited 34×
• Wheeler v. Catholic Archdiocese of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-09-15· cited 34×
• State v. Bush
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-02-28· cited 21×
• State v. Awawdeh
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-01-04· cited 11×