Supreme Court of Vermont· 3/14/1986
State v. Jarvis
Citations
- 509 A.2d 1005
- 146 Vt. 636
- 1986 Vt. LEXIS 350
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that civil liability need not be established in order for court to order restitution
- noting that “only liquidated amounts which are easily ascertained and measured are recoverable under the legislative [restitution] scheme,” and that damages “that are not readily ascertainable,” including pain and suffering and emotional trauma, are not recoverable
- noting that “only liquidated amounts which are easily ascertained and measured are recoverable under the legislative [restitution] scheme,” and that damages “that are not readily ascertainable,” including pain and suffering and emotional trauma, are not recoverable
- denying recovery of pain and suffering because of its uncertain nature and noting that the \evaluation of such losses is best left to the civil trial judge and to the collective wisdom of civil juries\
- when two statutory provisions, one general and the other specific, deal with the same subject matter, the more specific provision prevails
- when two statutory provisions, one general and the other specific, deal with the same subject matter, the more specific provision prevails
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Hill, Peck, Gibson, Hayes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re S.B.L.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-08-26· cited 133×
- State v. DriscollSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-08-01· cited 34×
- Lydy v. Trustaff, Inc./Wausau Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont· 2013-06-28· cited 30×
- Brown v. W.T. Martin Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2013-06-21· cited 23×
- Stevenson v. Capital Fire Mutual Aid System, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-03-24· cited 22×
- Delozier v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-04-30· cited 21×
- State v. Randell BlakeSupreme Court of Vermont· 2017-08-11· cited 18×
- State v. BohannonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-03-11· cited 14×
- State v. TetraultSupreme Court of Vermont· 2012-07-05· cited 14×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-04-17· cited 13×
- State v. BuelowSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-12-14· cited 13×
- State v. MaySupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-12-06· cited 12×
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-02-17· cited 12×
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-12-10· cited 8×
- State v. Ty Baker, Sr.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2017-10-06· cited 8×
- Sirloin Saloon of Shelburne, Rutland, & Manchester, Inc. v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-02-10· cited 8×
- Vermont Golf Association, Inc. v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont· 2012-08-10· cited 6×
- Williston Citizens for Responsible Growth v. Maple Tree Place AssociatesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-05-24· cited 6×
- State v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Vermont· 2012-10-26· cited 5×
- State v. VezinaSupreme Court of Vermont· 2015-04-10· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.