State v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• lost-profit component of restitution award appropriate where defendant sold merchandise to customers, did not record sales, and kept proceeds; presumably defendant made sales at retail price, depriving victim of profit on each sale
• where defendant employee stole proceeds of merchandise sales from retail store, “lost profits” component of proceeds was part of “economic loss” recoverable as restitution; however, adding profit margin to cost of missing inventory would have been too speculative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. May
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1996-12-06· cited 12×
• State v. Barrett
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-11-12· cited 10×
• State v. Adams
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-05-29· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Alford
  Supreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
• State v. Pearce
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-02-25· cited 25×
• State v. Howard
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-07-18· cited 15×
• Crouch v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1987-10-15· cited 4×