Court of Appeals of Arizona· 11/12/1993
State v. Barrett
Citations
- 864 P.2d 1078
- 177 Ariz. 46
- 152 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 37
- 1993 Ariz. App. LEXIS 252
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[S]imply adding a profit margin to the cost of lost inventory would be too speculative to be a measure of restitution.\
- lost-profit component of restitution award not proper where defendant stole inventory rather than cash from sales proceeds; evidence did not show causal relationship between defendant’s action and victim’s purported lost profits
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gerber, Grant, Foreman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-10-02· cited 31×
- State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-02-18· cited 29×
- State v. PearceCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-02-25· cited 25×
- State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-05-28· cited 17×
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-96304Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-11-05· cited 9×
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-04-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.