Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1/15/1859
State v. Matthews
Citations
- 37 N.H. 450
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the authority to punish for contempt is inherent in all courts of law or equity independent of statutory provisions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fowler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-03-13· cited 738×
- State v. LinskySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1977-10-31· cited 49×
- State v. LaFranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-11-23· cited 37×
- United States v. ShippSupreme Court· 1909-05-24· cited 36×
- Bonser v. CourtneySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1984-04-16· cited 18×
- State v. MartinaSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-12-06· cited 16×
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-05-06· cited 10×
- State v. GrossSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1977-10-31· cited 2×
- In re AtkinsD. Alaska· 1887-07-01· cited 1×
- Untitled Texas Attorney General OpinionTexas Attorney General Reports· 2014-07-02
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court· 1812-03-14· cited 761×
- Ex-parte AdamsMississippi Supreme Court· 1872-07-01· cited 27×
- Holcomb v. CornishSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1831-06-15· cited 18×
- Exparte LangdonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1853-07-15· cited 14×
- Rochelle v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama· 1839-01-15· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.