Tennessee Supreme Court· 1/19/2001

Johnson v. State

Citations

38 S.W.3d 52
2001 Tenn. LEXIS 55
2001 WL 46691

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that favorable evidence for Brady includes “evidence that could be used to impeach the State’s witnesses”
stating that information is considered material when “„there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different‟”
aggravating circumstance focusing on defendant’s actions and intent, rather than circumstances of killing, could not be applied vicariously
aggravating circumstance focusing on defendant’s actions and intent, rather than circumstances of killing, cannot be applied vicariously
“This Court has held on several occasions that in order to establish a Brady violation, four elements must be shown by the defendant: 1
“Evidence ‘favorable to the accused’ includes . . . evidence that could be used to impeach the state’s witnesses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice William M. Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

235 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.