Skip to main content

State v. Martin

Citations

  • 197 Conn. 17
  • 495 A.2d 1028
  • 1985 Conn. LEXIS 844

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing Practice Book § 720 [now § 39-26] as restriction on “authority of a court to permit withdrawal of aplea”
  • describing Practice Book § 720 [now § 39-26] as restriction on authority of court to permit withdrawal of plea
  • ‘‘the plea of nolo contendere may not be used against the defendant as an admission in a subsequent criminal or civil case’’ (emphasis added)
  • ‘‘[t]he only practical difference is that the plea of nolo contendere may not be used against the defen- dant as an admission in a subsequent criminal or civil case’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.