Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/23/1985
State v. Martin
Citations
- 197 Conn. 17
- 495 A.2d 1028
- 1985 Conn. LEXIS 844
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing Practice Book § 720 [now § 39-26] as restriction on “authority of a court to permit withdrawal of aplea”
- describing Practice Book § 720 [now § 39-26] as restriction on authority of court to permit withdrawal of plea
- ‘‘the plea of nolo contendere may not be used against the defendant as an admission in a subsequent criminal or civil case’’ (emphasis added)
- ‘‘[t]he only practical difference is that the plea of nolo contendere may not be used against the defen- dant as an admission in a subsequent criminal or civil case’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BadgettSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-07-08· cited 184×
- State v. AmarilloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-01-14· cited 130×
- State v. MaderaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-12-17· cited 114×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-02· cited 89×
- State v. GilniteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-02-24· cited 87×
- Town of Groton v. United Steelworkers of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-08-08· cited 62×
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-03· cited 45×
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-03-16· cited 44×
- State v. DasSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-04-28· cited 39×
- State v. SchaefferConnecticut Appellate Court· 1985-09-24· cited 37×
- State v. WebbConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-04-17· cited 34×
- State v. RishConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-02-07· cited 20×
- State v. GarvinConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-09-17· cited 19×
- State v. HansonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-10-06· cited 15×
- State v. MinerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-03· cited 13×
- White v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-09-24· cited 11×
- Town of Groton v. United Steelworkers of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-03-17· cited 9×
- State v. PerezConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-09-14· cited 9×
- State v. FalconConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-08-10· cited 7×
- State v. GilniteConnecticut Appellate Court· 1985-08-13· cited 5×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-02-26· cited 2,416×
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 1,382×
- Smith v. O'GRADYSupreme Court· 1941-02-17· cited 586×
- Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-09-28· cited 286×
- Diorio v. Kreisler-Borg Construction Co.Supreme Court· 1981-03-30· cited 126×
- Dukes v. Warden, Connecticut State PrisonSupreme Court· 1972-06-19· cited 124×
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-03-30· cited 121×
- United States of America Ex Rel. James Rogers v. Warden of Attica State Prison, Attica, New YorkSecond Circuit· 1967-07-10· cited 107×
- State v. GodekSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-11-25· cited 74×
- State v. ChildreeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-01-25· cited 73×
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-08-19· cited 72×
- Szarwak v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-07-23· cited 66×
- State v. BattleSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-03-30· cited 63×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-01-11· cited 62×
- Consiglio v. Warden, Connecticut State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1970-12-15· cited 53×
- State v. ShockleySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-12-21· cited 50×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.