State v. Das

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial court lacked jurisdiction over defendant's motion to vacate judgment of conviction and to withdraw plea after sentence had been executed and that no constitutional violation exception existed
• stating that coram nobis relief is not available “when habeas corpus affords a proper and complete remedy” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• noting that ‘‘[t]he issues of subject matter jurisdiction and preservation of claims for appellate review are separate and indepen- dent considerations’’
• Practice Book § 43-22 inapplicable to extent that defendant’s claims are based on alleged flaws in court’s acceptance of plea
• ‘‘[t]he Superior Court is a constitutional court of gen- eral jurisdiction’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• jurisdiction of trial court terminates upon execution of defendant's sentence and no \constitutional violation exception\ to that precept exists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).