State v. Godek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Connecticut's version of Rule 11 does not require a factual basis for a nolo contendere plea
• holding that Connecticut’s version of Rule 11 does not require a factual basis for a nolo contendere plea
• holding that Connecticut’s version of Rule 11does not require a factual basis fo r a nolo contendere plea
• stating that this court is not required to follow cases construing federal rules of civil procedure in interpreting similar Practice Book rule
• stating that “[w]e are very much aware that the constitutional rights of a criminal defendant in taking . . . a guilty . . . plea must be scrupulously protected,” but neverthe- less finding no error when trial court failed to advise defendant of his right to court trial
• \[t]he defendant raised neither of his [Practice Book] claims in the court below\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).