Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
California Supreme Court· 11/24/2008

People v. Brendlin

Citations

  • 45 Cal. 4th 262
  • 195 P.3d 1074
  • 85 Cal. Rptr. 3d 496
  • 2008 Cal. LEXIS 13631

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “case law uniformly holds that an arrest under a valid outstanding warrant—and a search incident to that arrest—is an intervening circumstance that tends to dissipate the taint caused by an illegal traffic stop”
  • stating that where a search is not undertaken until a warrant is discovered, the discovered “evidence was . . . the fruit of the outstanding warrant, and was not 10. (...continued
  • “[Short temporal proximity] is the typical scenario in essentially every case in this area.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • \[Short temporal proximity] is the typical seenario in essentially every case in this area.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • \[A] mere 'mistake' with respect to the ... law[] does not establish that the ... stop was pretextual or in bad faith.\
  • “[A] mere ‘mistake’ with respect to the . . . law[] does not establish that the . . . stop was pretextual or in bad faith.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baxter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Brendlin

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.