Skip to main content

State v. Strieff

Citations

  • 2012 UT App 245
  • 286 P.3d 317
  • 716 Utah Adv. Rep. 26
  • 2012 WL 3733662
  • 2012 Utah App. LEXIS 251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • gathering cases and concluding that most jurisdictions have “universally treated the discovery of an arrest warrant as an intervening circumstance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Voros, Thorne, Roth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

69 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.