Supreme Court of Iowa· 3/22/2000

State v. Martin

Citations

608 N.W.2d 445
2000 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 48
2000 WL 339911

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

suggesting courts use a colloquy found in the federal judges’ bench book to make sure the waiver is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary
reiterating court’s obligation under Faretta to make defendant “aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation” so he realizes the consequences of his choice (citation omitted)
stating we review a district court’s denial of a request to substitute counsel for an abuse of discretion, but we review de novo a claim the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights were violated
stating “we [have previously] pointed the bench and bar to a model inquiry for determining a knowing and intelligent waiver of counsel. The model inquiry is found in 1 Bench Book for United States District Judges 1.02–2 (3d ed. 1986

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter, Larson, Lavorato, McGIVERIN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.