Court of Appeals of Iowa· 10/29/2008

State v. Mott

Citations

759 N.W.2d 140
2008 Iowa App. LEXIS 1026
2008 WL 4725281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding substantial evidence supported 5 kidnapping instruction based on evidence “Mott ordered Floyd to lie still when people knocked on the door”
finding defendant’s “general complaints regarding his dislike of public defenders” and “disagreements over trial strategy” did not compel substitution
“Parties are not ... entitled to any particular instruction if the issue is adequately covered in other instructions.”
“We will not reverse the district court unless prejudice results from an erroneous jury instruction.”
“The court, however, is not required to permit this form of hybrid representation 23 where both the pro se defendant and standby counsel are actively participating as defense counsel at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vogel, Mahan, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.