Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1/25/2007

State v. Jackson

Citations

726 N.W.2d 454
2007 Minn. LEXIS 45
2007 WL 177797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that murder was reasonably foreseeable when the defendant attempted to rob a store with an assault rifle and a person he knew was “crazy enough” to do anything
noting that an “adequate general instruction on the credibility of witnesses” may mitigate the prejudicial effect of the district court’s failure to give an accomplice-testimony instruction
denying ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim that required consideration of facts that were not in the record
“Jackson’s claims about his counsel’s investigation and witness contacts require consideration of facts not in the trial record. Accordingly, we deny those claims without prejudice to Jackson’s right to raise them in a postconviction proceeding.”
“Jackson’s claims about his counsel’s investigation and witness contacts require consideration of facts not in the 13 trial record. Accordingly, we deny those claims without prejudice to Jackson’s right to raise them in a postconviction proceeding.”
“[The defendant’s] claims about his counsel’s investigation and witness contacts require consideration of facts not in the trial record. Accordingly, we deny those claims without prejudice to Jackson’s right to raise them in a postconviction proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.