Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/17/2019
State v. Magee
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 1921
Syllabus
Appellant did not demonstrate that the trial court failed to consider R.C. 2929.11 or that it acted vindictively when it sentenced him. The trial court committed plain error by imposing consecutive sentences without making the findings required by R.C. 2929.14(C)(4).
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CallaghanOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-31· cited 11×
- State v. BerryOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-30· cited 8×
- State v. SantellanaOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-23· cited 5×
- State v. TriceOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-11· cited 4×
- State v. PelmearOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-06· cited 2×
- State v. TinkerOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-11· cited 2×
- State v. WatsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-30· cited 1×
- In re M.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-17· cited 1×
- State v. SuttonOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-31· cited 1×
- State v. PerkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-27
- State v. CannonOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-23
- State v. ElstonOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-02-27
- State v. Fonseca-MoraOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-06-23
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.