Skip to main content

State v. Elston

Citations

  • 2026 Ohio 682

Syllabus

Duhart. By refusing to decide whether to testify, appellant forfeited the right to testify and was properly considered to have exercised his right to remain silent. Trial counsel was not ineffective. Appellant's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Judges: Duhart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.