Skip to main content

State v. Berry

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 2249

Syllabus

Trial court's unexplained 12-year delay in resentencing appellant did not violate requirement in Crim.R. 32(A) that an offender's \[s]entence shall be imposed without unnecessary delay\ because that provision does not apply on remand. Trial court committed plain error when it resentenced appellant by ordering concurrent sentences for two allied offenses of similar import instead of conducting an appropriate merger analysis, and by imposing costs that did not comply with the original appellate mandate.

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.