· 6/23/2026

State v. Fonseca-Mora

Citations

  • 2026 Ohio 2385

Syllabus

Zmuda, J., writing for the majority, finds that appellant's arguments are subject to review under R.C. 2953.08(G)(2)(a) and, under that standard, the trial court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences. Judgement affirmed.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.