In re M.D.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 845
Syllabus
FIFTH AMENDMENT – MIRANDA RIGHTS – CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL COUNSEL – PREJUDICE – PLAIN ERROR – AGGRAVATED ROBBERY – R.C. 2911.01 – TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE – R.C. 2921.12(A) – OBSCTRUCTING OFFICIAL BUSINESS – R.C. 2921.31 – EVIDENCE – SUFFICIENCY - MANIFEST WEIGHT The juvenile failed to establish an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim for failing to raise arguments in a motion to suppress because, although trial counsel's assistance was deficient for failing to argue that the juvenile requested an attorney, the juvenile failed to show a reasonable probability that the outcome of the proceedings would have been different if trial counsel had not been deficient. The juvenile failed to demonstrate that the juvenile court committed plain error because, although the juvenile court contravened Juv.R. 22(D)(3)'s requirement that it hold a hearing on the juvenile's motion to suppress, the juvenile failed to show that the error affected the outcome of the trial. The juvenile's delinquency adjudications for three charges of aggravated robbery in violation of R.C. 2911.01(a)(1) were supported by sufficient evidence and the manifest weight of the evidence where victim and officer testimony and the juvenile's statements connected the juvenile to all three robberies. Juvenile's delinquency adjudication for tampering with evidence in violation of R.C. 2921.12(A)(1) was supported by sufficient evidence and the manifest weight of the evidence where the juvenile court found the officer's testimony credible, and the officer's testimony established that the juvenile was carrying a gun, knew an investigation was pending, and discarded the gun. The juvenile's delinquency adjudication for obstructing official business in violation of R.C. 2921.31(A) was supported by sufficient evidence and the manifest weight of the evidence where the officer's testimony, which was deemed credible by the juvenile court, established that the officers had a reasonable articulable suspicion of crimina
Judges: Bock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 2,777×
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-09· cited 2,256×
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1,729×
- State v. SlagleOhio Supreme Court· 1992-12-31· cited 576×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1983-08-24· cited 530×
- State v. DrummondOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-18· cited 390×
- State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court· 1998-05-20· cited 293×
- State v. McNeillOhio Supreme Court· 1998-10-28· cited 226×
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-03· cited 184×
- State v. Neyland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-05-08· cited 181×
- State v. SandersOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-30· cited 156×
- State v. Osie (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-10· cited 155×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.