State v. Lutz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \A dog sniff of the exterior of an automobile during an otherwise lawful traffic stop does not implicate legitimate privacy interests and is not a search subject to the Fourth Amendment.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State of Kansas, ex rel. KHP v. $28,350 in U.S. Currency
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2025-01-10

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• United States v. Jacobsen
  Supreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
• Rodriguez v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2015-04-21· cited 2,086×
• Illinois v. Caballes
  Supreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
• Maryland v. Wilson
  Supreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 1,555×
• State v. Chandler
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2018-04-06· cited 299×
• State v. DeMarco
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1998-01-23· cited 164×
• State v. Hanke
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2018-04-20· cited 122×
• State v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2014-08-29· cited 105×
• State v. Sanchez-Loredo
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2012-03-23· cited 94×
• State v. Barker
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1993-04-16· cited 62×
• State v. Damm
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1990-03-02· cited 54×
• State v. Jimenez
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2018-06-22· cited 47×
• State v. Pink
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1985-03-02· cited 39×
• State v. Lowery
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2018-06-22· cited 30×
• State v. Harrington
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1978-10-20· cited 4×