State of Arizona v. Martin David Salazar-Mercado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “cold” expert testimony not based on the facts of a ease may be admissible if it satisfies Rule 702(a)-(c)
• holding that testimony that helps the jury understand possible reasons for victim's inconsistent reporting satisfies Rule 702(a)
• noting that expert testimony about general behavior patterns of child sexual-abuse victims is permitted when helpful for a jury to understand the evidence
• noting that expert testimony about general behavior patterns of child sexual-abuse victims is permitted when helpful for a jury to understand the evidence
• holding Dutton’s “cold expert” testimony satisfied Rule 702(a) because it “might have helped the jury to understand possible reasons for the delayed and inconsistent reporting”
• holding the court will not review the admissibility of testimony regarding the behavior of child sexual abuse victims without a sufficient record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).