State v. Casconi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating lack of stall doors does not lead to abandonment of all privacy rights, finding that clandestine police surveillance of door-less toilet stalls significantly impaired individual’s expectation of privacy
• hidden and warrantless police surveillance of a doorless public restroom stall significantly impairs freedom from scrutiny and, thus, constitutes a search under Article I, section 9
• video surveillance of public restroom violates Article I, sec- tion 9, privacy rights
• “We must look to the nature of the act alleged to be a search.”
• defendant convicted of public indecency for masturbating in a public bathroom stall where “[n]o one in the restroom saw defendant expose his genitals or masturbate,” but where he was caught on surveillance recording; court reversed as illegal warrantless search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).