Court of Appeals of Utah· 12/16/1992

State v. Long

Citations

844 P.2d 381
204 Utah Adv. Rep. 18
1992 Utah App. LEXIS 212
1992 WL 372257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

trial court erred in finding contempt when attorney was confused about how to comply with the rules, even though the rules were clear
trial court erred in finding contempt when attorney was confused about how to comply with the rules, even though the rules were clear
contempt under section 78-32-1(3) requires a showing that defendant “intended his acts to obstruct the judicial process”
contempt under section 78-32-1(3) requires a showing that defendant \intended his acts to obstruct the judicial process\
\An employee handbook may create binding terms only if those terms are consistent with the meaning of the contract as a whole.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Billings, Greenwood, Orme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.