Skip to main content
· 8/23/1982

Burgers v. Maiben

Citations

  • 652 P.2d 1320
  • 1982 Utah LEXIS 1036

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting claim by an accused contemnor who did not ask to confront a witness at the show-cause hearing or claim a violation of his right to confront witnesses below
  • “When such an untimely motion is made, the trial court's only alternative is to deny the motion”
  • “An untimely motion for a new trial has no effect on the running of the time for filing a notice of appeal.”
  • \An untimely motion for a new trial has no effect on the running of the time for filing a notice of appeal.\
  • An untimely motion for a new trial does not affect the running of time for filing a notice of appeal
  • applying due process principles to contempt proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.