Skip to main content

Von Hake v. Thomas

Citations

  • 759 P.2d 1162
  • 86 Utah Adv. Rep. 5
  • 1988 Utah LEXIS 64
  • 1988 WL 68461

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that orders finding a person guilty of criminal contempt are final, appealable orders
  • concluding that orders finding a person guilty of criminal contempt are final, appealable orders
  • explaining that, as general rule, court will not consider an issue raised for first time in reply brief
  • stating that criminal contempt involves fixed sanctions to punish the contemnor for disobeying a court order rather than conditional sanctions to compel compliance with a court order
  • stating that contemnor's knowledge \must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal contempt proceeding and by clear and convincing evidence in a civil contempt proceeding\ (citation omitted)
  • stating that for a party to be held in contempt for failing to comply with a court order, the court must find that the party knew what he was required to do, was able to comply, and willfully failed to comply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zimmerman, Hall, Howe, Stewart, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.