United States v. Harold A. Thoreen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that appeal was timely because criminal contempt order was docketed on civil docket instead of criminal docket
• concluding that appeal was timely because criminal contempt order was docketed on civil docket instead of criminal docket
• noting that 13 scrupulous candor and truthfulness in representations of any matter before a court is 14 a basic ethical requirement for attorneys
• noting that scrupulous candor and truthfulness in representations of any matter before a court is a basic ethical requirement for attorneys
• “Making misrepresentations to the fact finder is inherently obstructive because it frustrates the rational search for truth. It may also delay the proceedings.”
• “Making misrepresentations to the fact finder is inherently obstructive because it frustrates the rational search for truth. It may also delay the proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).