State v. Letourneau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The possibility of such confusion is particularly harmful to Letourneau given the fact that the evidence of having ingested methamphetamine does not and cannot, by itself, establish possession or control of the substance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Timley
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1994-05-27· cited 178×
• State v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-01-24· cited 140×
• State v. Mays
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2004-03-19· cited 107×
• State v. Flinchpaugh
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1983-02-19· cited 78×
• State v. Hill
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-07-20· cited 66×
• State v. Jenkins
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2002-02-01· cited 49×
• State v. McClanahan
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1996-01-26· cited 39×
• State v. Bloom
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2002-04-19· cited 39×
• State v. Mason
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1992-02-28· cited 25×
• State v. Pennington
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-12-12· cited 19×
• State v. Banks
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2002-05-31· cited 12×