State v. McClanahan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if a prosecutor’s misconduct was intentional and substantially prejudiced the defendant’s right to a fair trial, double jeopardy would prohibit a new trial
• holding that a \party cannot open the door for itself to present the inadmissible evidence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• State v. Moncla
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1997-04-18· cited 127×
• State v. Marsh
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2004-12-17· cited 96×
• State v. Evans
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-01-24· cited 78×
• State v. Clark
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1997-01-24· cited 75×
• State v. Miller
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2011-10-28· cited 75×
• State v. Heath
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1998-04-17· cited 71×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1999-09-24· cited 66×
• State v. Smallwood
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1998-03-06· cited 62×
• State v. Torres
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2005-10-21· cited 62×
• State v. Morton
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2007-03-16· cited 52×
• State v. McCray
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1999-05-04· cited 40×
• State v. Leitner
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-10-26· cited 39×
• State v. Davidson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1998-03-06· cited 34×
• State v. Bedford
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2000-06-02· cited 22×
• State v. Graham
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2004-01-30· cited 19×
• Green v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2011-03-03· cited 19×
• State v. Sanders
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1997-12-12· cited 17×
• State v. Muck
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1997-05-30· cited 15×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-06-08· cited 14×
• State v. Galloway
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2000-03-10· cited 13×