Arizona Supreme Court· 5/21/1996

State v. Lee

Citations

917 P.2d 692
185 Ariz. 549
217 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
1996 Ariz. LEXIS 58

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding not prejudicial the state’s inadvertent failure to provide defendant notice of intent to seek the death penalty under Rule 15.1.g(l
holding not prejudicial the state’s inadvertent failure to provide defendant notice of intent to seek the death penalty under Rule 15.1.g(l) until eighty-seven days after such notice was required because defendant had actual notice of the prosecutor’s intent to seek the death penalty
affirming pecuniary gain aggravating circumstance where defendant killed to facilitate escape after robbery
noting trial court’s discretion under Rule 15.7 in holding trial court did not err in allowing state to file a notice of intent after the deadline
noting trial court’s discretion under Rule 15.7 in holding trial court did not err in allowing state to file a notice of intent after the deadline
dangerous nature of kidnapping must be separately alleged and proved before it may be used to enhance sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zlaket, Feldman, Moeller, Martone, Corcoran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.