Skip to main content

State v. Leathers

Citations

  • 531 P.2d 901
  • 271 Or. 236
  • 1975 Ore. LEXIS 505

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an invalid sentence does not divest the trial court of jurisdiction
  • stating that an invalid sentence does not divest the trial court of jurisdiction
  • under the common law, a trial judge’s power to modify or vacate a valid sentence ends once the sentence has been executed
  • in adult criminal context, a sentence “must be in conformity with the governing statute; any non-conforming sentence is void for lack of authority and thus totally without legal effect”
  • “A sentence must be in conformity with the governing statute; any nonconforming sentence is void for lack of authority and thus totally with- out legal effect.”
  • “A sentence must be in conformity with the governing statute; any non-conforming sentence is void for lack of authority and thus totally without 3 The state contends that consecutive sentences are permitted under Article I, section 44(1)(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connell, McAllister, Denecke, Holman, Tongue, Bryson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.