Oregon Supreme Court· 2/13/1975
State v. Leathers
Citations
- 531 P.2d 901
- 271 Or. 236
- 1975 Ore. LEXIS 505
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that an invalid sentence does not divest the trial court of jurisdiction
- stating that an invalid sentence does not divest the trial court of jurisdiction
- under the common law, a trial judge’s power to modify or vacate a valid sentence ends once the sentence has been executed
- in adult criminal context, a sentence “must be in conformity with the governing statute; any non-conforming sentence is void for lack of authority and thus totally without legal effect”
- “A sentence must be in conformity with the governing statute; any nonconforming sentence is void for lack of authority and thus totally with- out legal effect.”
- “A sentence must be in conformity with the governing statute; any non-conforming sentence is void for lack of authority and thus totally without 3 The state contends that consecutive sentences are permitted under Article I, section 44(1)(b
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Connell, McAllister, Denecke, Holman, Tongue, Bryson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BurkhartTennessee Supreme Court· 1978-05-30· cited 260×
- State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court· 1997-02-21· cited 171×
- Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court· 1990-12-20· cited 147×
- State v. JaloCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-12-27· cited 72×
- Saif Corp. v. HerronCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-07-08· cited 56×
- State v. SpeedisOregon Supreme Court· 2011-06-30· cited 44×
- State v. StroupOregon Supreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 41×
- State v. BraughtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-03-28· cited 30×
- State Ex Rel. O'Leary v. JacobsOregon Supreme Court· 1983-09-27· cited 25×
- State v. ClassenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-11-15· cited 21×
- State v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-01-28· cited 18×
- State v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-17· cited 17×
- State v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-09-08· cited 16×
- State v. HorsleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-06-28· cited 14×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. RialCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-08· cited 12×
- State v. PinkowskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-12· cited 11×
- State v. StockmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-11-26· cited 11×
- State v. HastingsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-01-19· cited 9×
- Stroup v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-15· cited 9×
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-06-12· cited 8×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LudwigOregon Supreme Court· 1959-10-07· cited 35×
- Gordon Sayre Little v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1954-08-02· cited 28×
- State v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court· 1967-02-23· cited 27×
- State v. CottonOregon Supreme Court· 1965-04-14· cited 21×
- STATE Ex Rel GLADDEN v. KELLYOregon Supreme Court· 1958-04-16· cited 20×
- State v. CannonOregon Supreme Court· 1884-03-15· cited 20×
- State v. CommedoreOregon Supreme Court· 1964-11-04· cited 13×
- Rightnour v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1959-12-09· cited 9×
- Scharbrough v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-11-11· cited 4×
- State v. LeathersCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-07-29· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.