Mattiza v. Foster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that it was interpreting the phrase “bad faith” “for the purposes of ORS 20.105(1)”
• explaining that it was interpreting the phrase “bad faith” “for the purposes of ORS 20.105(1)”
• identifying and addressing “prevailing party” language as imposing a distinct condition for recovery of fees pursuant to ORS 20.105
• looking to the “primary aim” of the litigants to determine if they acted in bad faith
• construing statute as to matters that are generally not germane to issues here
• discussing an earlier version of ORS 20.105(1) that referred to “meritless” claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

106 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Peeples v. Lampert
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-08-14· cited 389×
• McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-06-11· cited 121×
• McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-04-23· cited 77×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Ashley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-10-10· cited 63×
• State v. Porter
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-09-19· cited 59×
• State v. Trenary
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-05-06· cited 58×
• Pamplin v. Victoria
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-08-04· cited 50×
• Staten v. Steel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-20· cited 46×
• State v. Castrejon
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-22· cited 38×
• Mantia v. Hanson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-11-13· cited 37×
• Wardley Better Homes and Gardens v. Cannon
  Utah Supreme Court· 2002-10-11· cited 35×
• Tenold v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-04-20· cited 33×
• J.C. Compton Co. v. Brewster
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-12-11· cited 30×
• Williams v. SALEM WOMEN'S CLINIC
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-08· cited 29×
• Secor Investments, LLC v. Anderegg
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-06-12· cited 29×
• Patton v. Department of Revenue
  Oregon Tax Court· 2005-04-21· cited 26×
• Wilkes v. Zurlinden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-06-11· cited 25×
• McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-05-09· cited 23×
• Detrick v. Oregon Department of Revenue
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-02-26· cited 23×
• L. H. Morris Electric, Inc. v. Hyundai Semiconductor America, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-12-07· cited 22×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society
  Supreme Court· 1975-05-12· cited 4,586×
• Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
  Supreme Court· 1978-01-23· cited 3,039×
• Deras v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-05-14· cited 151×
• Whipple v. Howser
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-08-11· cited 139×
• State v. Leathers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-02-13· cited 44×
• Lewis v. Department of Revenue
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-11-30· cited 27×
• Hughes v. Bembry
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1970-06-10· cited 26×
• Riedel v. First Nat. Bank of Or.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-08-07· cited 25×
• Tyler v. Hartford Insurance Group
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-04-04· cited 11×
• Henderson v. Jantzen, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 10×
• Portland Development Commission v. CH2M Hill Northwest, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-07-06· cited 3×
• Brown v. Infotec Development, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-10-21· cited 3×
• Tyler v. Hartford Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-10-11· cited 2×
• Nortman v. City of Portland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-09-14· cited 1×
• Mattiza v. Foster
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-10-26· cited 1×

Other cases named Mattiza v. Foster

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Mattiza v. Foster
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-10-26· cited 1×