Oregon Supreme Court· 4/14/1965
State v. Cotton
Citations
- 400 P.2d 1022
- 240 Or. 252
- 1965 Ore. LEXIS 489
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant’s original sentence was void because it violated the sentencing statutes
- holding that the defendant’s original sentence was void because it violated the sentencing statutes
- sentencing court had duty to vacate invalid sentence and impose valid sentence even though defendant had begun serving sentence
- sentencing court had duty to vacate invalid sentence and impose valid sentence even though defendant had begun serving sentence
- “The court in imposing punishment for a criminal offense is limited strictly to the provisions of the applicable statute, and any deviation from the statute in the mode, extent or place of punishment renders the judgment void.”
- ‘The court in imposing punishment for a criminal offense is limited strictly to the provisions of the applicable statute, and any deviation from the statute in the mode, extent or place of punishment renders the judgment void.’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McAllister, Perry, O'Connell, Denecke, Lusk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LeathersOregon Supreme Court· 1975-02-13· cited 44×
- Dow v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1971-04-06· cited 43×
- State v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-17· cited 17×
- State v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-10-22· cited 16×
- State v. O'NEALCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-02-17· cited 14×
- State v. HorsleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-06-28· cited 14×
- Stroup v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-15· cited 9×
- State v. BarkleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-09-11· cited 7×
- State v. BattyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-09-25· cited 7×
- State v. LebeckCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-12-27· cited 5×
- State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-02-10· cited 4×
- State v. GranberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-18· cited 4×
- State v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1972-11-10· cited 3×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-09-27· cited 2×
- State v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-11-12· cited 2×
- State v. CarrilloCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-12-08· cited 1×
- State v. LeathersCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-07-29· cited 1×
- State v. HiattCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-07-15
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.