State v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ORS 138.222(2)(d) precludes review of a sentence where the parties stipulated that the court could impose a particular sentence or a sentence within a particular range, but does not preclude review of other kinds of stipulated terms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Easton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-01-25· cited 15×
• State v. Ivie
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-05-30· cited 11×
• Green v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2009-03-05· cited 10×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-05-25· cited 8×
• State v. Keys
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-02-26· cited 8×
• State v. Granberg
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-08-19· cited 2×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. O'BRIEN
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-04-06· cited 135×
• State v. Barrett
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-09-14· cited 96×
• State v. Terry
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-12-28· cited 88×
• State v. Kephart
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-12-16· cited 54×
• State v. Leathers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-02-13· cited 44×
• State v. Upton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-02-01· cited 11×
• State v. Highland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-01-24· cited 7×
• State v. Miner
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1959-11-04· cited 6×
• State v. Barrett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-04-29· cited 6×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-11-18· cited 4×